Your claim that non-heterosexuals "aren't fully developed humans" raises several questions.
Theologically: how does this revelation affect dogma regarding a Creator? Did God just make a mistake - and why has the topic of "non-human humans" not ever come up in the past? Surely you of all people know that there have been non-heterosexuals since long before the forming of the Church; the papacy alone has had several of them according to well-documented history. Since the apostolic nature of the Church is THROUGH the papacy itself, what does it mean since some of that tradition involves "non-human humans"?
Rights: Of course the wider problem is introduced within the context of "human rights." Which human rights apply ONLY to "complete humans" and which are no longer extendable to "under-developed homans?"
Language: to what extent does a word like "humane" apply to those who are no longer included as real humans?
Genetics: if someone has children and then is discovered to be "not fully human" what status does that make the child? IS there some miracle in conception that a non-heterosexual parent having a fully-heterosexual child somehow re-instates their complete humanity? If the child is also non-heterosexual are they even less human than their less-than-human parent?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment