Brian Brown:
When Massachusetts gained marriage equality, you complained that using the judiciary to uphold fundamental unalienable rights was "activism", and said that extension of equality (which is an entirely impossible concept) needs to be done through the legislature.
When New York gained marriage equality through the action of the legislature, you complained that this was inappropriate, and that it should be done through referendum (even though that's not possible in New York).
With the odds mounting that at least ONE of the upcoming referendums on marriage equality will actually come down on the side of marriage equality - what do you plan to do then? Will you be so dishonest as to suggest that that state's judiciary block marriage equality?
Also, shouldn't you rectify your campaign donation issues with the state of Maine (and all of the other states) before entering into the fray with this current referendum?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment